Showing posts with label Urban Planning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Urban Planning. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

Now and When if it were Here?




 Hong Kong has a population of 7.3 million (excluding visitors) in a territory of 1104km².  Given this brimming density, the city is already suffering from multi-layered problems in health, environment and development issues.  Most deplorable of all and especially to the underclass, basic human conditions
 are slipping by the day.

Photographic exhibition of poverty in Hong Kong at here.



The roving exhibition in Hong Kong from October 13-21, 2012.

3D animation originally conceived for the 12th 
International Architecture Exhibition, Venice Biennale 2010. 
(photo www.infrabodies.com)

Urban Cyberspace

Co-created by Ivan Rijavec and John Gollings, “Now and When: Australian Urbanism” toured to Hong Kong featuring an approx. 20-minute cinematic 3D video animation and photography in a makeshift darkroom set-up.  The quality of digital graphics was stunning, comparable to that of Pixar-styled cinematography.  Perhaps due to budgetary or technical reasons, there was no commentary or any sound effect.  The exhibition catalogue was too brief to provide any information concept and design intents either.  Negotiating through the thick curtain on the way out, all was left spinning in the head were endless impressions of phantasmagoric urban landscapes of Australia in future. 




Attention seeking Ivan Rijavec with shocking statements 
that breaks the day - Sunday Morning Post 
October 12, 2012.  (article  www.scmp.com)

Sunday Treat

It was Rijavec who made a blood-curdling statement in the local newspaper that drew me to the exhibition show in the first place.  He suggested that Hong Kong, a well known city with massive population should build twice as dense per capita, based on the high density of inhabitants in the Forbidden City durig Qing dynasty.  Having seen the exhibition I chose to believe that this tiny metropolis foothold, if Rijavec’s suggestion be implemented, would only conjure up bleak imageries from films like Blade Runner and A.I. Artificial Intelligence.



Blade Runner  (images Warner Bros. Pictures)


A.I. Artificial Intelligence  (images DreamWorks)



Machination of Image


I hate to barb on our fellow professionals, but as an architect myself, I hope we should offer at least minimum research studies before making wild statements in public.  This is only common to all other professions.  The reality-free video discourses are imaginative, but they also borderline on being unscientific if not downright nonsensical. Too heavy a dose of sensationalism will only numb the audience as well as architect.  It is a vicious cycle that can only escalate further.

Acceptance has been duly granted to the growing trend that architects are becoming image makers.  Architecture and especially urban planning are art form only if rigorous considerations on subjects like geography, town-planning, economics and other relevant disciplines are met.  We don’t need architects to provide mere visual stimulus if there are already writers and film-makers in the sci-fi markets.


This is already the best clip from YouTube:




Exhibition in Summary 

The stereoscopic visualization is comprised of 2 parts, namely Now and When.

Now is a 3D photographic study by John Gollings on existing Australian urban conditions juxtaposed with mining landscapes.



(photos John Gollings)


When is emerged from an ideas competition on exploring Australian urban planning and architecture of the future.  17 selected entries vary from private practices to academics.  The resulting animation was developed jointly by John Gollings and Ivan Rijavec, with visual production by Floodslicer.

(all below images and write-ups www.architecturemedia.com)


[1] Multiplicity - John Wardle Architects and Stefano Boscutti
Growth is no longer on its periphery but at our heart. Melbourne has grown not out, but up and down. In the future our city will tell multiple stories. A building of narratives and possibilities. 


[2] Symbiotic City - Steve Whitford (U of Melbourne) and James Brearley (BAU Brearley Architects and Urbanists) 
Layered networks of urban and rural systems allow nature and the city to combine in a symbiotic relationship of mutual benefit.


[3] Mould City - Colony Collective 
An urban system that reconfigures the relationship between humans, shelter and collective settlements. Mould will not save us, but if we learn how to tend it, new and rich possibilities will emerge.


[4] Terra Form Australis - Hassell, Holopoint and 
The Environment Institute
Asks what strategic moves Australia would have to make to accommodate a population of 50 million people in the year 2100.


[5] The Fear Free City - Justyna Karakiewicz, 
Tom Kvan and Steve Hatzellis 
Seven desperate dreams are followed by seven desiring 
dreams in a project that attempts to flush away fear and reveal the opportunities for a rewarding, sustainable city.


[6] Survival vs. Resilience - BKK Architects and Village Well
From an assumption that cities have to be planned before they are formed, this project explores the conventional wisdom of the multi-centred city.


[7] Ocean City - Arup Biomimetics
Tackling the large-scale migration of the Australian population from land to sea, necessitating a rise in biomimetic practices. 


[8] -41+41 - Peck Dunin Simpson Architects and 
Eckersley Garden Architecture
Looking at how ideas recycle and morph over time, this project looks 41 years into the past to see 41 years into the future.


[9] Sydney 2050: Fraying Ground - Richard Goodwin Art/Architecture and Terroir
Urban strategies of fraying, knotting and parasitism are realized through a process of remapping and drawing across all scales.


[10] Island Proposition 2100 - Room 11
Embodying hyper-connectivity, the IP2100 spine contains a looped system of hybrid infrastructures, initiating a new symbiotic relationship between the urban centres and their supporting territories.


[11] Aquatown - NH Architecture 
As water and resources diminish the need for a new kind of infrastructure increases, bringing new urban forms with it. Australia’s growth cities respond like tree roots searching for nourishment, spreading into new borders and territories.

[12] A City of Hope - Edmond and Corrigan
A specialist city of 50,000 located on the boundary of Little Desert National Park in the Wimmera region of Victoria.


[13] A Tale of Two Cities - Billard Leece Partnership 
Excess consumption has bankrupted cradle-to-grave industrial economies and cities have contracted, condensed and multiplied. Visible as a holographic projection, the city’s doppelganger audits and guides the city’s development far below.


[14] Implementing the Rhetoric - Harrison and 
White with Nano Langenheim 
Optimistically imagines that by 2050 politicians and planning authorities will have the power, conviction and know-how to decisively address critical urban issues. Using de-fragmented design techniques we visualize a literal, undiluted sustainable urbanism – solar amenity, strategic density increase and walkable cities.


[15] Sedimentary City - Brit Andresen and Mara Francis 
The sedimentary city of Brisbane is layered city-on-city, its layers existing in time and in space. New layers carry the trace of past cities with potential to draw in missed fragment catalysts.


[16] Loop-Pool / Saturation City - McGauran Giannini Soon, 
Bild + Dyskors and Material Thinking
A manufactured crisis – a 20-metre rise in sea level – enables an exploration of the future of Australian urbanism through four distinct typologies.

[17] How Does it Make You Feel? - Statkus Architecture
Based on the premise that gravity is able to be controlled, fundamentally changing the way structures are realized and opening up the possibility of floating cities.




此時,彼時,在這裡  〈中文摘要〉

遠道而來的《此時∞彼時:澳洲的都市計劃學》乃大約二十分鐘的建築設計及城市規劃電腦立體動畫。無疑,這個數碼影片視覺質素尚佳,甚至足以媲美荷李活動漫效果。基於不知明原因,動畫不備旁述,展覽場刋介紹過於簡陋(最後只能在網上掌握設計慨念之一二)。看畢影片撥簾而出,只覺無數建築影像在腦中不斷盤旋,混沌非常。

這次參觀原於星期天南華早報裡報道雷雅維克 (Ivan Rijavec)的展覽。但他的驚人發表確實令人感覺不寒而慄,原因他建議香港參照清代紫禁城人口之高密度情况,建築發展大可比現今提高一倍。這言論除了譁眾取寵,確實荒誕不經。我恐怕若按雷氏的方案,電影2020(Blade Runner)及人工智能(A.I. Artificial Intelligence)的末世蒼涼絕境將充斥於本城角落。

身為建築師一份子,我討厭批評同業。帷我真誠希望大家在發表任何偉論之前,應提供有據研究。展覽影片天馬行空式的都市影像,盡是創意,但它們同時亦介乎非科學,甚至懸堪荒謬境界。現今建築師對形象的偏嗜,只能無奈接受。不過若要致力建築尤其是都市設計,不談藝術前題,設計者應著力相關科目如地理、城市規劃、經濟等,務必通過研究過程,辯證論述。這個世代已有作家及電影從業,他們更適合提供科幻式視覺刺激,建築師恐怕不應佔這份兒。

《此時∞彼時:澳洲的都市計劃學》展覽分為二部份;《此時》Now–展示現今澳洲都市及鑛場對立的三維高空攝影;《彼時》When–都市未來建構演進的推想。


《彼時》共有十七作品,按上述英文介紹,順序分別是,一:多層之城;二:共生之城;三:微菌之城;四:南方造陸;五:無懼之城;六:生存對韌性;七:海洋之城;八:+41-41;九:悉尼2050年–崩解之地;十:島議2100;十一:水之城鎮;十二:希望之城;十三:雙城物語;十四:化言於行;十五:沉積之城;十六:飽和之城;十七:你有何感覺?





Monday, 21 March 2011

Venture of Culture in Hong Kong (West Kowloon Cultural Hub)


(This blogpage contains explicit materials some people might find offensive.)




The jury members of the West Kowloon Cultural District masterplan competition.  Can we feel culture in the air?

 

It is predictable yet woeful to know that Norman Foster has been chosen as the winner of the West Kowloon Cultural District masterplan design competition.  What can one expect from the SAR government and its design advisory board on issues of art and culture?  No wonder why the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority CEO, Graham Sheffield, had decided to call it a day in Hong Kong after a service of merely five months.  Smart move indeed.


When Henry Tang explained to us on TV that the overriding factor for choosing Foster’s scheme is its flexibility and ability to build the cultural hub in stages, one can only be dumbfounded on the extremely low quality mindsets the government officials have.  It is not design merits but normative practicalities that count.  And it is a crying shame they think so lowly the artistic judgment of the Hong Kong people when spelling out the reasons.


It is a situation tinged with anger and sadness.  One can only comment on this result with sarcasm and a bit of lateral thinking.


Behind the shades


The concept of ‘City Park’ is seriously dated as architectural concept and anonymous to the Hong Kong context.



A truly visionary masterstroke from Norman Foster that the 19-hectare green park boasting leafy vegetation throughout, in fact, can effectively hide potential ugly museums and concert halls on the same site in future.  Remember the difficult facelift challenges we still confront with on the cultural centre and space museum.



Most expansive tree planting exercise in the world

Foster’s tactics of tree planting captivate the local folks.  Plainly speaking, he is a clever fox with long experiences in Hong Kong.


Just in passing, as the buildings play second fiddle and the infrastructure is designed to serve the greenery, how much does it cost to plant the trees in order to materialize Foster’s grand concept of ‘City Park’?  With an overall budget of 21,600 million and a target of 5000 trees, it takes a tidy sum of 4.32 million to grow a tree.  The leisurely strolling under the canopies of trees acquires a fiscal dimension.

 

Architect’s decision as God’s will

Lamentable poor souls that are trapped in an underground working space.

 


To execute on the beautiful vision of LOHAS, all car users are persecuted from enjoying day light and fresh air since all major vehicular roads will be sunken at subterranean levels.  Unfortunately, this applies to service vehicles in which support staff and delivery people would not have the choice to use public transport for their work.  Their only option is to consume flume and be exempt from natural lighting as far as their works are concerned.  Cruel and punitive formalism of boardroom decisions from the architect and the management.  Well, would they care?



Sentimental keywords always win the day

Sullen looking Rem Koolhaas too esoteric for Hong Kong.



Rocco Yim with lesson to learn.


Incorrect prevailing wind direction - one typical mistake from foreign architects including Norman Foster who do not care to investigate on the local environment.



Foster claims to achieve a carbon-neutral rating for the development.  The grey water recycling, heat recovery and solar energy strategies he listed out are nothing new and are almost as dated as the concept of ‘City Park’.  The wind energy generation is a token gesture at a very high construction costs, a pretty design toy for one technology architect like Norman Foster.  Rem Koolhaas, highly regarded for his avant garde thinking, would have sneezed at the idea of peddling mechanical provisions in the Architect’s Statement.


Playing Dan Brown in Hong Kong

The middle finger - ICC tower by KPF architects.

 

A ‘canon and balls’ statement boldly designed by Foster.

 


One codified message I read from Foster’s scheme is the egotistic phallic motif he planted on the grand masterplan.  After all, he has proudly pocketed four major projects in this city, namely the HSBC Headquarters, Chek Lap Kok Airport, the Cruise Terminal and this time, the West Kowloon Masterplanning.  With an inkling from the book The Da Vinci Code, Foster’s phallic statement boldly echoes with the middle finger hidden symbol dressed up as the nearby ICC building by KPF of the United States.  Such subversive messages for the innocent public of Hong Kong may prove too much to bear.